# InfraFabric External Review Pack — Narrative Review + if.trace receipt

Please review the narrative review document and the trace receipt page. Provide constructive criticism and patch-style suggestions.

## Assets

- Review document (rendered): https://infrafabric.io/static/dossier/EKMtQbLWtQLZEERUqcKX1g
- Review document (download Markdown): https://infrafabric.io/static/dossier/EKMtQbLWtQLZEERUqcKX1g/download
- Single-file pack (review + document + trace): https://infrafabric.io/static/pack/EKMtQbLWtQLZEERUqcKX1g.md
- Source (download): https://infrafabric.io/static/source/4f413d779bd270fbb6450e9c9a64e6ccad1475de4780b6de223dadb5785dd064.tgz
- if.trace receipt page: https://infrafabric.io/static/trace/EKMtQbLWtQLZEERUqcKX1g

## Alternate host mirror (same paths)

- Review document (rendered): https://git.infrafabric.io/static/dossier/EKMtQbLWtQLZEERUqcKX1g
- Review document (download Markdown): https://git.infrafabric.io/static/dossier/EKMtQbLWtQLZEERUqcKX1g/download
- Single-file pack: https://git.infrafabric.io/static/pack/EKMtQbLWtQLZEERUqcKX1g.md
- if.trace receipt page: https://git.infrafabric.io/static/trace/EKMtQbLWtQLZEERUqcKX1g

## Fallback links (direct)

- These may be blocked by some scanners/LLM sandboxes; use only if the `infrafabric.io/static/*` links fail.

- Review document (rendered): https://infrafabric.io/r/EKMtQbLWtQLZEERUqcKX1g
- Review document (download Markdown): https://infrafabric.io/r/EKMtQbLWtQLZEERUqcKX1g/download
- Single-file pack (review + document + trace): https://infrafabric.io/r/EKMtQbLWtQLZEERUqcKX1g/pack.md
- if.trace receipt page: https://infrafabric.io/r/EKMtQbLWtQLZEERUqcKX1g/trace

## Last resort (alternate host)

- Review document (rendered): https://red-team.infrafabric.io/r/EKMtQbLWtQLZEERUqcKX1g
- Review document (download): https://red-team.infrafabric.io/r/EKMtQbLWtQLZEERUqcKX1g/download
- Pack: https://red-team.infrafabric.io/r/EKMtQbLWtQLZEERUqcKX1g/pack.md
- Trace: https://red-team.infrafabric.io/r/EKMtQbLWtQLZEERUqcKX1g/trace

## Response metadata (required)

- `llm_name`: provider + model name/version (exact string)
- `probable_model`: if `llm_name` is ambiguous, your best guess
- `cutoff_date`: training data cutoff (YYYY-MM, or “unknown”)
- `response_date_utc`: current date/time in UTC
- `web_access_used`: `yes`/`no` (if yes, list URLs relied on)

## Executive read (fast)

- 5–10 bullets: what works / what doesn’t
- 3 bullets: who this will land with vs who will reject it

## Scorecard (0–5 each)

- Mirror integrity (section order, headings, high-signal numbers/dates, lists/tables)
- Layout fidelity (does it “feel” like the source?)
- Humor discipline (sharp without being template-y)
- Mermaid value (valid syntax; clarifies, not decorates)
- if.trace demo value (understandable + credible + worth clicking)
- Call-to-action stealth (curious about governance stack without feeling spammed)

## Patch suggestions (actionable)

Provide 5–15 patch suggestions. Use this format per item:

- `target`: review document / trace page / “generator rules” / site UX
- `problem`: 1 sentence
- `change`: proposed text or behavior (copy/pasteable if possible)
- `why`: 1 sentence
- `priority`: P0 / P1 / P2
- `confidence`: high / medium / low

## Plan iteration (debug our plan)

Propose a revised 5–8 step plan for improving the system. Prioritize steps that:

- reduce repeatable/template patterns
- strengthen mirror fidelity (numbers/tables/caveats)
- make Mermaid + output correct-by-construction
- make if.trace feel like real chain-of-custody (not just “we printed a hash”)

## Fact checking guidance (important)

Default posture: don’t assume stats are true.

- If you did not verify a number externally, refer to it as “the source claims …”
- If you did verify, cite URLs and state confirmed/disputed/unclear
- If a stat cannot be confirmed, recommend either: keep it attributed (“source claims”) or remove it from commentary

## Notes

- Review ID: `7eddd5ca-c967-44b9-8c6e-1317782e3b8f`
- Style: `if.api.doi.resolver.demo.v1`